Framework / EU AI Act
Prepare your documentation for the EU AI Act.
Fencia helps you compare AI system documentation with the EU AI Act requirements in its current coverage register. Possible gaps stay connected to their source, so your legal or compliance lead can decide what applies and what to do next.
A first-pass documentation review supports preparation. It does not determine your final legal obligations or establish conformity with the Regulation.
EU AI Act / Covered requirements
Live product
Your EU AI Act readiness, in the product
EU AI Act readiness, article by article
The 39 EU AI Act requirements in Fencia's register, each with its state for your organisation and your AI systems — gap, needs review or not applicable — and the evidence and findings behind it.
A percentage that explains itself
Readiness counts only what can be assessed for your systems. Items that do not apply are set aside, and the page says what is preventing a fuller assessment, such as open findings whose requirement cannot be assessed yet.
Not a conformity assessment or a CE marking
Each article, for the systems it affects
Article 4 AI literacy applies to the organisation; Article 50 transparency, Article 5 prohibited practices and Article 6 classification to each AI system. Filter by state and open any requirement to act on it.
Critical requirements are flagged
Real Fencia screens from a test workspace. Names and data are fictional.
Scope, stated plainly
What this review can show.
The register is versioned (2026-10-15.1) and covers selected EU AI Act obligations. It is not the entire Regulation or a substitute for a formal conformity assessment.
Read the EU AI Act on EUR-Lex See which articles Fencia covers Keep the Article 4 training record- Supported requirements
- Fencia evaluates documentation against the selected requirements in its current coverage register, with article references and possible gaps for review.
- Risk and role
- System context can help organize a preliminary classification. A person still needs to decide the system’s role, risk category and applicable duties.
- AI literacy (Art. 4)
- The training register records people, sessions and attendance, shows whose training is current and proposes Article 4 evidence for a person to confirm.
- Evidence
- Findings can point to source passages and suggested next steps. The organization must retain original documents and validate each finding.
- Outside this review
- Fencia checks a defined subset of articles. It does not conduct a conformity assessment, issue a CE mark or guarantee that a system complies.
EU AI Act questions before you start
Readiness reflects Fencia's versioned register, not a regulator's determination. A responsible person decides what applies to each system and records why.
Does Fencia cover the whole EU AI Act?
No. It covers 39 requirements selected in a versioned register, with the article behind each one. The articles index lists what is covered and how.
Does my role change the obligations?
Yes. Providers, deployers, importers and distributors have different obligations. Fencia asks for each system's role before it decides which requirements apply.
Can I analyse my documents against it?
Yes. Upload an AI policy, a model card or a notice and each possible gap comes back with its article and the passage that raised it.
Does it replace a conformity assessment?
No. Fencia supports preparation. It does not run a conformity assessment, issue a CE marking or determine your final legal obligations.
See where your AI systems stand
Register a system and analyse a document, and Fencia shows your EU AI Act readiness requirement by requirement.