SYNTHETIC REPORT PREVIEW
See the evidence behind a possible AI Act finding.
This fictional report shows the kind of questions a reviewer can ask when an AI-system document is compared with selected EU AI Act requirements. The passages and findings are written examples, not a customer result or the output of a live scan.
FENCIA / EXAMPLE REVIEW
AI system documentation review
Fictional document: ai-system-policy-example.pdf
Questions to take forward
Open each sample finding to follow its source passage to a reviewer question and suggested next step.
01EU AI Act · Article 9Risk review cadence may need clarification
“The product owner revisits model risks when material issues are reported.”
The excerpt names a person, but does not describe a regular review or where residual risks are recorded.
Does another procedure establish the review cadence, and does Article 9 apply to this system?
Ask the system owner for the risk-management procedure and link the relevant evidence before deciding.
02EU AI Act · Article 14Human oversight evidence may need context
“Operations may pause the system if an issue is noticed.”
This passage mentions intervention, but does not show the instructions, controls or tests behind it.
What oversight measures are documented, and who can verify how they work?
Request the operator instructions and control evidence; have a responsible reviewer assess the full record.
03EU AI Act · Article 11Version history is not shown in the excerpt
“Model description, version 2. Previous specification superseded.”
A version label is present. The example excerpt does not show what changed or where that history is kept.
Is a change log maintained in the full technical documentation?
Locate the version record and link it to the system documentation before resolving this question.
Scope: Fencia’s scanner evaluates selected EU AI Act requirements and part of the GDPR. ISO/IEC 42001 is a separate governance mapping, not a document scan or certification.
Explore EU AI Act coverageYOUR DOCUMENTS NEED THEIR OWN REVIEW
Start with the source you already have.
Analyze a supported document, inspect possible findings beside their evidence and let a responsible person decide the next step.